Solutions
Neurosurgeon operating with intraoperative brain imaging
Neurosurgery
Functional brain-network data for complex neurosurgical decisions.
Clinician reviewing brain imaging on a monitor
Neurology
Objective brain function insights for more informed neurological care.
Older couple walking outdoors
Brain Health
Supporting healthier brains through earlier insight.
Clinicians reviewing a brain scan on a monitor
Clinical Research
Empowering the next generation of neuroscience research.
TechnologyResourcesQuantalX NeuroscienceReimbursementAboutContact us
QuantalX Neuroscience
All resources
Peer-reviewed publication
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
2026

Towards a neurophysiological diagnostic marker of Alzheimer's disease using transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography

Ben-Hayun R, Zifman N, Hadad R, Fogel H, Levy-Lamdan O, Verhovski N, Yarovinsky N, Ayoub-Agbaria R, Tanne D

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease journal cover
Key finding

P30 amplitude after left motor cortex stimulation was higher in biomarker-confirmed Alzheimer's disease than in controls and in other causes of cognitive impairment.

Study design
Clinical study, TMS-EEG with Delphi-MD™
Participants
90 participants: 22 biomarker-confirmed AD, 27 other cognitive impairment, 41 controls

Summary

A scalable, objective measure of cortical function that separates Alzheimer's disease (AD) from other causes of cognitive impairment is still lacking. This study tested whether the P30 amplitude, recorded with TMS-EEG after stimulation of the left primary motor cortex (M1L), reflects AD-related changes in cortical excitability.

Study design

  • Participants: 90 in total, all assessed with M1L TMS-EEG using Delphi-MD™.
  • Groups: biomarker-confirmed AD (22), other cognitive impairment (27: vascular or mixed 12, frontotemporal dementia 4, unknown etiology 11) and cognitively normal controls (41).

Key findings

  • P30 amplitude differed across the three groups (p = 0.009).
  • P30 was higher in biomarker-confirmed AD than in other cognitive impairment (p = 0.037, d = 0.61) and than in controls (p = 0.002, d = 0.80).
  • Among 27 clinically suspected AD patients tested for biomarkers, P30 was higher in biomarker-positive (22) than biomarker-negative (5) patients (p = 0.035, d = 0.98), with an ROC of 0.853 (95% CI 0.627–1.000).
  • P30 was not associated with cerebrovascular changes (p = 0.455).

Authors' conclusions

The authors report that P30 amplitude is elevated in biomarker-confirmed AD, in line with amyloid-associated cortical hyperexcitability, and present it as a promising non-invasive physiological biomarker that may aid differential diagnosis and, potentially, disease monitoring in AD.

Read the full article

Ben-Hayun R, Zifman N, Hadad R, Fogel H, Levy-Lamdan O, Verhovski N, Yarovinsky N, Ayoub-Agbaria R, Tanne D. Towards a neurophysiological diagnostic marker of Alzheimer's disease using transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2026;112:1895–1903. doi:10.1177/13872877261463653

Summary prepared by QuantalX from the published abstract. All results are as reported by the authors. The full text is available from the publisher.

Bring brain function data into your practice

Talk to the QuantalX team about Delphi-MD™ in your clinical setting.

Request a demo
On this page
Section
Journal
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Year
2026
DOI
10.1177/13872877261463653
Licence
Copyright SAGE Publications. Summary by QuantalX
Read in the journal
QuantalX Neuroscience
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on clinical updates and company news.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy and provide consent to receive updates from our company.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Solutions
NeurosurgeryNeurologyBrain HealthClinical ResearchPsychiatry
Company
TechnologyPartner ZoneResourcesAbout UsContact
Follow us
Facebook
Instagram
X
LinkedIn
© 2026 Quantalx. All rights reserved.
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
*All clinical interpretations of Delphi-MD™ assessments must be made by qualified healthcare professionals within the context of a full patient evaluation. The Delphi-MD™ system is intended to elicit, record, and analyze TMS-evoked brain potentials (TEPs) and provide quantitative output parameters compared against a normative reference database limited to ages 50–75. Adverse events during or after evaluation may include headache, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, insomnia, anxiety/agitation, back or neck pain, vomiting, tinnitus, migraine aura, and abnormal sensations. Delphi-MD™ is not intended to be relied upon solely to make or confirm a diagnosis. For more information, refer to the Delphi-MD™ user manual.
Schedule a Demo